Saturday, September 12, 2026Français/English
The foundations behind the news.
The Foundations
THE BRIEF
Building Business · September 10, 2026

Fox-Roku: the 2% antitrust filter that decides big deals

A request for documents blocks nothing. It hits only 2.1% of notified deals, yet what it triggers usually ends in abandonment or restructuring rather than in front of a judge. Merger control works through the calendar far more than through any verdict.

Fox-Roku: the 2% antitrust filter that decides big deals

The fact

On 8 September 2026, the US Department of Justice sent Fox and Roku a “second request” for documents in its review of their $22 billion combination. Nothing has been blocked: the agencies are simply asking for more paperwork. Fox still targets a close in the first half of 2027.

Two charts: 41 of the 1,944 eligible deals notified to the US agencies in fiscal 2025 drew a second request, or 2.1%; and of the 18 enforcement actions brought that year, 8 ended in abandonment or restructuring, 5 in negotiated remedies, and 5 in litigation.

Why it matters

A request for documents sounds procedural. Statistically, it is the moment a deal’s odds flip. In fiscal year 2025, 2,006 transactions were notified to the US agencies; 1,944 of them were eligible for a second request, and 41 drew one: 2.1%. The filter is narrow, and what passes behind it changes shape. That same year the agencies brought 18 enforcement actions: 8 ended with the deal abandoned or restructured before any litigation, 5 with negotiated remedies, and only 5 with a case filed in court.

The mechanism is about the calendar, not the verdict. Until the parties have “substantially complied”, the regulatory clock stays stopped, and thirty more days run after that. Complying means months of document collection. The same logic runs elsewhere under other names: a European Phase II opens 90 working days of in-depth investigation, a British Phase 2 runs 24 weeks, and both can be extended. Regulators rarely block. They make things last.

The stakes are concrete. For the target’s shareholders, the announced price stops being the expected price: the gap with the share price now measures a probability rather than a premium. For employees on both sides, uncertainty settles in for a year or more. For rivals, every month gained is a month the buyer cannot integrate anything. A deal can die without a single judge ruling on it, simply because it ended up costing too much time.

To understand the full mechanics of a deal, from first contact to integration, read the Fundamental: “Mergers and acquisitions: how M&A deals work.”

You'll learn why due diligence cuts the price on 30 to 40% of deals, how the acquisition premium is calculated, and why promised synergies so rarely materialise.

Read the Fundamental →

Sources and references

TechCrunchPress
FTC and DOJ Antitrust Division: 48th annual Hart-Scott-Rodino report (fiscal year 2025)Official
Report : ftc.gov
Fox Corporation: Form 425 filed with the SECOfficial
Regulatory filing : sec.gov
Competition and Markets Authority: quick guide to UK merger assessment (CMA18)Official
Guide : gov.uk
American Bar Association: the fundamentals of European merger controlPress
Analysis : americanbar.org
A&O Shearman: reading the FY2025 HSR annual reportData
Analysis: aoshearman.com

Article written by The Foundations. The foundations behind the news.

thefoundations.co

Newsletter

Liked this Brief? Get the next ones.

Our best analyses, once a week, free. No account needed.